With that said, a TV-based video camera needs to have a few things going for it to be of any use: first, it needs to be easy to set up and non-intrusive in that when you’re not using it, it’s like it’s not there - the TV isn’t being bothered. Related: Take a look at the Logitech Streamcam review Also, you’re more likely to be ready for a video if you’re at the TV, as opposed to clutching the phone or tablet to see who’s there while you’re pulling up your pants in the morning. When you think about it, having video face-to-face and the like through a TV makes more sense than using a computer or a mobile device - for one thing, the screen you’re watching is pretty big, so that’s easier on the eyes. What we don’t have in any abundance is a way to use that video linkage with the main guy at home: the TV. Hence we got webcams and Skype and you-name-it. That’s partly because more people are on the go as they communicate, but also because it took “consumer-based” technologies to come into play for people to use. Okay, so that’s all changed now that we have mobile devices like smartphones and tablets. Additionally, you can check out our comparison of Avermedia PW513 vs Logitech Brio to see which 4K webcam will suit your needs best. Either way, if you’re looking for the best Logitech webcam or any other reliable webcam for the job, our review will make your work easier. And as a result of that, the technology for linking a video image with a “telephone” call hasn’t been sexy either. But for the consumer, “conference” isn’t sexy. Video conferencing has been around for a while - heck, I can remember as a kid trying out a version of it in a booth at Walt Disney’s EPCOT center.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |